Jurisprudence (1st Semester)

Law is a system of rules created and enforced by governmental or social institutions to regulate behavior. It ensures justice, resolves conflicts, and maintains social order.

The term Law is derived from the Latin term “Lex” which means rule or set of rules. So law is considered as a rule, principle, doctrine, norms of conduct and social norms values.

Law is a system of rules created and enforced by a governing authority to regulate behavior, maintain order, ensure justice, and protect rights and freedoms in society.

Law is necessary for maintaining order and stability in society, protecting rights and liberties, regulating social, economic, and political activities.

Law is a structured system of rules and principles created by recognized authorities to govern human behavior, resolve disputes, and establish justice.

Law is a system rule to control human behavior in society and to regulate total social system.

Laws can be enacted by legislatures, interpreted by courts, and enforced by governments.

For more details click the link

Open detailed note

Jurisprudence is the study of the fundamental principles, theories, and philosophy of law.

Jurisprudence examines the nature, purpose, sources, and application of legal rules within society.

Jurisprudence helps develop a deeper understanding of legal reasoning, justice, and the legal system.

Jurisprudence is systematic legal theory, interpretation of Law, rule of Law, origin of law, back bone of Law, history of Law, found of Law, source of Law, investigation of Law, picture of Law, foundation of Law, grammar of Law and Life of Law.

The word Jurisprudence is derived from the Latin term “Jurisprudentia” where Juris refers to Law and Prudential means study, knowledge or skill.

Jurisprudence is a study, knowledge and skill of law.

Jurisprudence is a science of law.

Jurisprudence is a study of both the theoretical and practical aspects of the law.

For Detatils click the link

Open detailed note

Natural Law School is a philosophical and jurisprudential framework centred on the belief in inherent, universal principles governing human conduct. Rooted in the idea that these principles derive from nature, reason and often a divine source, proponents (समर्थक) argue for a connection between morality and law.

The natural law school of jurisprudence is a legal philosophy that holds that laws are based on universal moral principles. It’s based on the idea that there are inherent (अन्तरनिहित) laws that exist regardless of what laws are enacted (लागू गर्नु) by human.

Natural school of law is generally regarded as the law of nature, divine law or the law that is universal and eternal in nature.

The Natural School of Law, also known as Natural Law Theory, is grounded in the belief that law should be based on universal moral principles that are inherent in human nature and can be discovered through reason and human experience. This school of thought asserts (दावी गर्नु) that there are fundamental rights and principles that exist in nature, and these should form the basis of human-made laws.

For more details click the link

Open detailed note

Law is found not made is key concept of historical school of Jurisprudence, it rejects to positive law and natural law both.

This school contrasts with Analytical School (which views law as the command of the sovereign)

The Historical School of Jurisprudence is a legal philosophy that emphasizes the evolutionary nature of law, considering it a product of historical development, customs, and societal traditions rather than being created by a sovereign or legislature. This school argues that law evolves gradually over time, reflecting the customs, culture, and historical experiences of a society.

Historical Jurisprudence came to prominence during the German Debate over the proposed codification of German Law.

For more details click the link

Open detailed note

The Analytical School of Law is one of the most significant schools of legal thought, focusing on law as a system of rules established by a sovereign authority. It analyzes legal concepts logically and systematically, without considering moral or social implications. This approach forms the basis of legal positivism, which asserts that laws derive their legitimacy from authority rather than morality.

Meaning and Characteristics

Contrast and Counter to the Natural Law School

Views law as a command issued by a sovereign and backed by sanctions.

Treats law as a self-contained and autonomous system of rules, separate from morality, customs, or divine commands.

Emphasizes legal structure, precise definitions, and logical coherence in legal interpretation. Focuses on what the law is (positivism) rather than what it ought to be (natural law

For more details click the link

Open detailed note

The Sociological School of Law emphasizes the relationship between law and society, focusing on how laws evolve based on social needs, customs, and changing circumstances. It argues that law is not just a set of abstract rules but a social institution shaped by cultural, economic, and political factors.

The Sociological School of Law emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries as a reaction to the rigid (कडा) formalism of legal positivism and natural law theories. It focuses on the relationship between law and society, emphasizing that law should reflect and adapt to social realities.

The Sociological School of Jurisprudence views law as a social phenomenon (घटना), focusing on its practical application and impact on society, rather than abstract (अमूर्त/सार) legal principles. It emphasizes the relationship between law and society, studying how legal rules affect social structures and how social conditions influence legal development.

In simple words, the jurists of this school strong stand for the principle that studying the law in action is better. (कानुनको व्यवहारिक अध्ययन गर्नु राम्रो हो भन्ने सिद्धान्तमा अडिग)

For more details click the link

Open detailed note

The Realist Law School is a legal philosophy that emphasizes the practical application of law, focusing on how laws function in real life rather than just their theoretical foundations.

It argues that laws are not merely written rules but are shaped by judicial decisions, social influences, and practical outcomes.

The Realist Law School is a legal theory that emphasizes the role of judges, judicial decisions, and real-life social and political influences in shaping the law. realism argues that :

Law is not just statutes or legal texts but also the actual practices of courts and legal institutions.

Judges’ decisions are influenced by personal experiences, economic, political, and social factors.

The law evolves through judicial interpretations rather than strict legal codes.

The legal realism movement emerged in the early 20th century, particularly in the United States, with thinkers like Oliver Wendell Holmes, Karl Llewellyn, and Jerome Frank emphasizing that law is what the courts say it is in practice.

For more details click the link

Open detailed note

Economic Law School as known “Socialist” or “Marxist” Law School (don’t be confused)

The Economic (Marxist) Legal Thought focuses on the relationship between law, economics, and society, emphasizing the role of law in supporting the economic system, particularly capitalism, and serving the interests of the ruling class.

This school of thought views law as a tool for maintaining social order and preserving economic structures, particularly those that sustain the power and wealth of the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) (पूँजीवादी/साम्रराज्यवाद) over the proletariat (working class) (सर्वहारा वर्ग)

The Origins of the socialist legal system can be traced back to the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, which gave birth to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

It is based on the civil law system, with major modifications and additions from Marxist and Leninist ideology (originated and developed by influencing the concept of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Hagel and other socialist philosopher. Joseph Stalin, Mao, Kim III Sung, Deng Xiao Ping, Fidel Castro are contributor. Plato is the concept profounder.

For more details click the link

Open detailed note

Critical Legal Studies (CLS) is a theoretical movement in legal scholarship that emerged in the 1970s as a critique of traditional legal doctrines.

CLS challenges the idea that law is neutral, objective, and independent of social influences. Instead, it argues that law is deeply intertwined with political, social, and economic power structures, often reinforcing existing hierarchies and inequalities.

Key essential of CLS :

•Developing critical thinking skills in legal analysis.

•Challenging traditional legal interpretations to promote justice and equality.

•Engaging in legal reform efforts with a focus on dismantling oppressive structures.

Contributing to a more equitable and inclusive legal system in Nepal.The intellectual movement known as Critical Legal Studies (‘CLS’) emerged in the United States in the late 1970s, and quickly spread to Europe. The movement was united rather more by a set of progressive political attitudes than agreement on a particular theoretical perspective.

CLS challenges the idea that law is neutral, objective, and independent of social influences. Instead, it argues that law is deeply intertwined with political, social, and economic power structures, often reinforcing existing hierarchies and inequalities.

The political orientation was leftist, but not Marxist, and, as the movement evolved, it increasingly stressed issues concerning minorities and identity politics, until it dissolved into these other streams, such as critical race theory, in the 1990s.

For more details click the link

Open detailed note

Feminist Jurisprudence is a branch of legal theory that examines how laws have historically contributed to gender inequality and advocates for legal reforms to promote gender justice.

It critiques traditional legal structures, interpretations, and institutions that reinforce patriarchal norms and seeks to develop legal approaches that advance women’s rights and gender equality.

Feminism is a range of socio-political movements and ideologies that aim to achieve the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes, often advocating for the rights and interests of women.

Feminism is a critical legal perspective that challenges traditional legal structures, advocating for gender equality and the recognition of women’s rights within the legal system.

It critiques laws, legal institutions, and societal norms that have historically marginalized women and other gender minorities.

For more details click the link

Open detailed note

Jurisprudence is the philosophical study of law, exploring its nature, sources, principles, and impact on society. Law and jurisprudence have developed in distinct ways across different civilizations.

The two major traditions : Eastern and Western jurisprudence offer unique perspectives on legal principles, justice, and governance. Understanding both traditions is essential for Nepalese law students to navigate Nepal’s hybrid legal system, which incorporates elements from both traditions.

For more details click the link :

Open detailed note

Post-modern theories of jurisprudence challenge the foundational principles of traditional legal thought, emphasizing skepticism (आशंका), deconstruction, and the fluid (तरल पदार्थ) nature of law. These theories critique the idea of absolute legal truths and argue that law is not a fixed system but rather a construct influenced by language, power, and social context.

Key themes of post-modern jurisprudence include:

Skepticism Toward Grand Narratives– Post-modernists reject universal legal principles, arguing that law is shaped by historical, cultural, and social factors rather than objective truth.

Deconstruction– Drawing from Jacques Derrida, post-modern legal theorists analyze legal texts to uncover hidden biases, contradictions, and assumptions.

Power and Law– Influenced by Michel Foucault, post-modern jurisprudence views law as a tool of power that reinforces dominant ideologies rather than serving justice impartially.

For details click the link

Open detailed note

Rights are legally recognized claims or entitlements that individuals possess against the state or other individuals. In jurisprudence, rights can be classified as:

Legal Rights – Rights recognized and enforced by the legal system. E.g., Right to Property, Right to Equality.

Moral Rights – Ethical entitlements not necessarily enforceable by law. E.g., Right to Respect.

Human Rights – Fundamental rights inherent to all individuals, e.g., Right to Life, Freedom of Speech.

Constitutional Rights – Rights guaranteed by the Constitution of Nepal, e.g., Right to Education, Right to Justice

For more details

Open detailed note

Administration means management and justice means doing what is fair and right. When we talk about the administration of justice, we are talking about how a government keeps things fair and right within its borders by using its power to enforce the rules. To make sure justice is done, a government needs to have the power to use force when necessary. There are two important things every government must do:

­Protect the country from enemies and

­Keep things fair and right within its borders.

Administration of justice refers to the process by which legal institutions enforce laws, resolve disputes, and ensure fairness in society. It is a fundamental function of the state, ensuring that justice is upheld through a structured legal system.

The administration of justice is the process by which the legal system of a government is executed. The presumed goal of such an administration is to provide justice for all those accessing the legal system.

For more details click the link

Open detailed note